0.00/0.03 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.14/0.39 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu 0.14/0.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.14/0.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.14/0.39 % Memory : 8046.5625MB 0.14/0.39 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic 0.14/0.39 % CPULimit : 1440 0.14/0.39 % WCLimit : 180 0.14/0.39 % DateTime : Mon Jul 27 10:16:36 UTC 2026 0.14/0.39 % CPUTime : 0.14/0.39 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.14/0.46 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.jOtU48p0N2/E---3.1_746550.p 0.20/0.51 % Version: 3.5.1-ho 0.20/0.51 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHSN. 0.20/0.51 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.20/0.51 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 900s (5) cores 0.20/0.51 % Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 180s (1) cores 0.20/0.51 % Starting almost_fo_3_lam with 180s (1) cores 0.20/0.51 % Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores 0.20/0.51 % ho_unfolding_3 with pid 746563 completed with status 0 0.20/0.51 % Result found by ho_unfolding_3 0.20/0.51 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHSN. 0.20/0.51 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.20/0.51 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 900s (5) cores 0.20/0.51 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto) 0.20/0.51 % No SInE strategy applied 0.20/0.51 % Search class: HHUNF-FFSS00-SHSSMFNN 0.20/0.51 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total) 0.20/0.51 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores 0.20/0.51 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 91s (1) cores 0.20/0.51 % Starting sh5l with 82s (1) cores 0.20/0.51 % Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 82s (1) cores 0.20/0.51 % Starting lpo1_def_fix with 82s (1) cores 0.20/0.51 % ehoh_best_sine_rwall with pid 746570 completed with status 0 0.20/0.51 % Result found by ehoh_best_sine_rwall 0.20/0.51 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLMNHSN. 0.20/0.51 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.20/0.51 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 900s (5) cores 0.20/0.51 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto) 0.20/0.51 % No SInE strategy applied 0.20/0.51 % Search class: HHUNF-FFSS00-SHSSMFNN 0.20/0.51 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total) 0.20/0.51 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores 0.20/0.51 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 91s (1) cores 0.20/0.51 % Starting sh5l with 82s (1) cores 0.20/0.51 % Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 82s (1) cores 0.20/0.51 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.20/0.51 % Presaturation interreduction done 0.20/0.51 0.20/0.51 % Proof found! 0.20/0.51 % SZS status Theorem 0.20/0.51 % SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.20/0.51 thf(decl_25, type, mnot: ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.20/0.51 thf(decl_26, type, mor: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.20/0.51 thf(decl_28, type, mimplies: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.20/0.51 thf(decl_41, type, msymmetric: ($i > $i > $o) > $o). 0.20/0.51 thf(decl_43, type, mtransitive: ($i > $i > $o) > $o). 0.20/0.51 thf(decl_50, type, mvalid: ($i > $o) > $o). 0.20/0.51 thf(decl_54, type, rel_s5: $i > $i > $o). 0.20/0.51 thf(decl_55, type, mbox_s5: ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.20/0.51 thf(decl_57, type, p: $i > $o). 0.20/0.51 thf(decl_58, type, q: $i > $o). 0.20/0.51 thf(decl_59, type, esk1_0: $i). 0.20/0.51 thf(decl_60, type, esk2_0: $i). 0.20/0.51 thf(decl_61, type, esk3_0: $i). 0.20/0.51 thf(decl_62, type, esk4_0: $i). 0.20/0.51 thf(decl_63, type, esk5_0: $i). 0.20/0.51 thf(mimplies, axiom, ((mimplies)=(^[X6:$i > $o, X7:$i > $o]:(mor @ (mnot @ X6) @ X7))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.jOtU48p0N2/E---3.1_746550.p', mimplies)). 0.20/0.51 thf(mnot, axiom, ((mnot)=(^[X6:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(~((X6 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.jOtU48p0N2/E---3.1_746550.p', mnot)). 0.20/0.51 thf(mor, axiom, ((mor)=(^[X6:$i > $o, X7:$i > $o, X3:$i]:((((X6 @ X3))|((X7 @ X3)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.jOtU48p0N2/E---3.1_746550.p', mor)). 0.20/0.51 thf(mtransitive, axiom, ((mtransitive)=(^[X13:$i > $i > $o]:(![X15:$i, X16:$i, X17:$i]:((((((X13 @ X15 @ X16))&((X13 @ X16 @ X17))))=>((X13 @ X15 @ X17))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.jOtU48p0N2/E---3.1_746550.p', mtransitive)). 0.20/0.51 thf(prove, conjecture, (mvalid @ (mor @ (mbox_s5 @ (mimplies @ (mbox_s5 @ p) @ (mbox_s5 @ q))) @ (mbox_s5 @ (mimplies @ (mbox_s5 @ q) @ (mbox_s5 @ p))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.jOtU48p0N2/E---3.1_746550.p', prove)). 0.20/0.51 thf(mvalid, axiom, ((mvalid)=(^[X6:$i > $o]:(![X3:$i]:((X6 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.jOtU48p0N2/E---3.1_746550.p', mvalid)). 0.20/0.51 thf(mbox_s5, axiom, ((mbox_s5)=(^[X6:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(![X14:$i]:(((~((rel_s5 @ X3 @ X14)))|((X6 @ X14))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.jOtU48p0N2/E---3.1_746550.p', mbox_s5)). 0.20/0.51 thf(msymmetric, axiom, ((msymmetric)=(^[X13:$i > $i > $o]:(![X15:$i, X16:$i]:((((X13 @ X15 @ X16))=>((X13 @ X16 @ X15))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.jOtU48p0N2/E---3.1_746550.p', msymmetric)). 0.20/0.51 thf(a2, axiom, (mtransitive @ rel_s5), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.jOtU48p0N2/E---3.1_746550.p', a2)). 0.20/0.51 thf(a3, axiom, (msymmetric @ rel_s5), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.jOtU48p0N2/E---3.1_746550.p', a3)). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_10, plain, ((mimplies)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:((((~((Z0 @ Z2))))|((Z1 @ Z2)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mimplies])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_11, plain, ((mnot)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i]:(~((Z0 @ Z1))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mnot])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_12, plain, ((mor)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:((((Z0 @ Z2))|((Z1 @ Z2)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mor])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_13, plain, ((mtransitive)=(^[Z0:$i > $i > $o]:(![X15:$i, X16:$i, X17:$i]:((((((Z0 @ X15 @ X16))&((Z0 @ X16 @ X17))))=>((Z0 @ X15 @ X17))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mtransitive])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ~((mvalid @ (mor @ (mbox_s5 @ (mimplies @ (mbox_s5 @ p) @ (mbox_s5 @ q))) @ (mbox_s5 @ (mimplies @ (mbox_s5 @ q) @ (mbox_s5 @ p)))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_15, plain, ((mimplies)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:((((~((Z0 @ Z2))))|((Z1 @ Z2)))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11]), c_0_12])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_16, plain, ((mvalid)=(^[Z0:$i > $o]:(![X3:$i]:((Z0 @ X3))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mvalid])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_17, plain, ((mbox_s5)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i]:(![X14:$i]:(((~((rel_s5 @ Z1 @ X14)))|((Z0 @ X14))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mbox_s5])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_18, plain, ((msymmetric)=(^[Z0:$i > $i > $o]:(![X15:$i, X16:$i]:((((Z0 @ X15 @ X16))=>((Z0 @ X16 @ X15))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[msymmetric])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_19, plain, ![X23:$i, X24:$i, X25:$i]:((((rel_s5 @ X23 @ X24)&(rel_s5 @ X24 @ X25))=>(rel_s5 @ X23 @ X25))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[a2, c_0_13])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, ~(![X34:$i]:((![X30:$i]:((~(rel_s5 @ X34 @ X30)|(~(![X28:$i]:((~(rel_s5 @ X30 @ X28)|(p @ X28))))|![X29:$i]:((~(rel_s5 @ X30 @ X29)|(q @ X29))))))|![X33:$i]:((~(rel_s5 @ X34 @ X33)|(~(![X31:$i]:((~(rel_s5 @ X33 @ X31)|(q @ X31))))|![X32:$i]:((~(rel_s5 @ X33 @ X32)|(p @ X32))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_12]), c_0_15]), c_0_16]), c_0_17])])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_21, plain, ![X26:$i, X27:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X26 @ X27)=>(rel_s5 @ X27 @ X26))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[a3, c_0_18])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_22, plain, ![X36:$i, X37:$i, X38:$i]:((~(rel_s5 @ X36 @ X37)|~(rel_s5 @ X37 @ X38)|(rel_s5 @ X36 @ X38))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])])])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ![X43:$i, X46:$i]:((((rel_s5 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0)&((~(rel_s5 @ esk2_0 @ X43)|(p @ X43))&((rel_s5 @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)&~(q @ esk3_0))))&((rel_s5 @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0)&((~(rel_s5 @ esk4_0 @ X46)|(q @ X46))&((rel_s5 @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0)&~(p @ esk5_0)))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])])])])])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_24, plain, ![X39:$i, X40:$i]:((~(rel_s5 @ X39 @ X40)|(rel_s5 @ X40 @ X39))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])])])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_25, plain, ![X3:$i, X14:$i, X15:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X3 @ X15)|~((rel_s5 @ X3 @ X14))|~((rel_s5 @ X14 @ X15)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, (rel_s5 @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_27, plain, ![X3:$i, X14:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X14 @ X3)|~((rel_s5 @ X3 @ X14)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_28, negated_conjecture, (rel_s5 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_29, negated_conjecture, ~((p @ esk5_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_30, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i]:(((p @ X3)|~((rel_s5 @ esk2_0 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, (rel_s5 @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_32, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X3 @ esk4_0)|~((rel_s5 @ X3 @ esk1_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_26])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_33, negated_conjecture, (rel_s5 @ esk2_0 @ esk1_0), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_28])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_34, negated_conjecture, ~((rel_s5 @ esk2_0 @ esk5_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29, c_0_30])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_35, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i]:(((rel_s5 @ X3 @ esk5_0)|~((rel_s5 @ X3 @ esk4_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_31])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_36, negated_conjecture, (rel_s5 @ esk2_0 @ esk4_0), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32, c_0_33])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_37, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34, c_0_35]), c_0_36])]), ['proof']). 0.20/0.51 % SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.20/0.51 % Parsed axioms : 74 0.20/0.51 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.20/0.51 % Initial clauses : 48 0.20/0.51 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 37 0.20/0.51 % Initial clauses in saturation : 11 0.20/0.51 % Processed clauses : 34 0.20/0.51 % ...of these trivial : 0 0.20/0.51 % ...subsumed : 0 0.20/0.51 % ...remaining for further processing : 34 0.20/0.51 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.20/0.51 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.20/0.51 % Backward-subsumed : 0 0.20/0.51 % Backward-rewritten : 0 0.20/0.51 % Generated clauses : 35 0.20/0.51 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 18 0.20/0.51 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.20/0.51 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.20/0.51 % Paramodulations : 35 0.20/0.51 % Factorizations : 0 0.20/0.51 % NegExts : 0 0.20/0.51 % Equation resolutions : 0 0.20/0.51 % Disequality decompositions : 0 0.20/0.51 % Total rewrite steps : 13 0.20/0.51 % ...of those cached : 3 0.20/0.51 % Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.20/0.51 % Propositional check models : 0 0.20/0.51 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.20/0.51 % Propositional clauses : 0 0.20/0.51 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.20/0.51 % Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.20/0.51 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.20/0.51 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.20/0.51 % Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.20/0.51 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.20/0.51 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.20/0.51 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.20/0.51 % Current number of processed clauses : 23 0.20/0.51 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 11 0.20/0.51 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.20/0.51 % Negative unit clauses : 4 0.20/0.51 % Non-unit-clauses : 8 0.20/0.51 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6 0.20/0.51 % ...number of literals in the above : 12 0.20/0.51 % Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.20/0.51 % Current number of archived clauses : 11 0.20/0.51 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 12 0.20/0.51 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12 0.20/0.51 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0 0.20/0.51 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1 0.20/0.51 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.20/0.51 % BW rewrite match attempts : 8 0.20/0.51 % BW rewrite match successes : 0 0.20/0.51 % Condensation attempts : 0 0.20/0.51 % Condensation successes : 0 0.20/0.51 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3129 0.20/0.51 % Search garbage collected termcells : 605 0.20/0.51 0.20/0.51 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.20/0.51 % User time : 0.005 s 0.20/0.51 % System time : 0.005 s 0.20/0.51 % Total time : 0.010 s 0.20/0.51 % Maximum resident set size: 3700 pages 0.20/0.51 0.20/0.51 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.20/0.51 % User time : 0.022 s 0.20/0.51 % System time : 0.016 s 0.20/0.51 % Total time : 0.037 s 0.20/0.51 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages 0.20/0.51 % E exiting 0.20/0.52 EOF